School Library Connection Archive

Big6 by the Month: A Common Sense Approach to Effective Use of Common Standards for Information Literacy Learning

Article

COMMON STANDARDS, COMMON THREADS, EXTRAORDINARY OPPORTUNITIES

The education landscape is littered with acronyms, buzzwords, fads, trends, invective, platitudes, and promises. Critical thinking, problem-solving, 21st century skills, standards, and inquiry learning are just some of the more pervasive recent terms.

A quick Google search produces millions of results related to these terms. And while there are some valuable and useful resources for teachers who want to improve their instructional toolkits with best practices in these areas, it’s hard to know where to begin or what to include. Too often, educators do not have what they need to effectively develop these skills in students: a clearly defined and implemented curriculum and instructional approach that incorporates critical thinking across all content areas.

With the creation and widespread adoption of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for English Language Arts/Literacy and Mathematics, renewed attention is being paid by classroom teachers, teacher-librarians, technology teachers, and school leaders to the common thread that connects the sets of standards: critical thinking.

With this in mind, our Big6 by the Month team has developed a unified approach with practical ideas and resources to help make information problem-solving instruction defined, predictable, measured, and reported. For example, the “defined” section of the Big6 by the Month program has illustrated the correlation of individual state standards, the Common Core State Standards, and information and communication technology standards, with the Big6 process.

FIG. I. BIG6 SKILLS ALIGNED WITH COMMON CORE AND ICT* LITERACY STANDARDS

Standards describe what students should know and be able to do. The Big6 Skills is an information problem-solving process that can help students achieve educational standards by giving them strategies to accomplish the “able to do” part of the definition of standards.*ICT = Information and Communication Technology

 

Big6 SkillCollege and Career Readiness
Anchor Standards for Writing
Standards for Mathematical PracticeStandards for the 21st-Century
Learner (AASL, 2007)
NETS-S (ISTE, 2007)
1. Task
Definition
7. Conduct short as well as
more sustained research
projects based on focused
questions, demonstrating
understanding of the subject
under investigation.
1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them:…plan a solution pathway
4. Model with mathematics: …apply mathematics to solve problems arising in everyday life.
1.1.3 Develop and refine a range of questions to frame the search for new understanding.
1.2.1 Display initiative and engagement by posing questions and investigating the answers beyond the collection of superficial facts.
3a. Plan strategies to guide inquiry.
4a. Identify and define authentic problems and
significant questions for
investigation.
4b. Plan and manage activities to develop a solution or
complete a project.
2.
Information
Seeking
Strategies
8. Gather relevant information
from multiple print and digital
sources, assess the credibility
and accuracy of each source,
….
1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them:…use concrete objects or pictures to help
conceptualize and solve a problem.
3. Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others: … distinguish correct logic or reasoning from that which is flawed
1.1.4 Find, evaluate, and select appropriate sources to answer
questions.
1.1.5 Evaluate information found in selected sources on
the basis of accuracy, validity, appropriateness for needs, importance, and social and cultural context.
3c. Evaluate and select
information sources and
digital tools based on the
appropriateness to specific
tasks.
3. Location & Access8. Gather relevant information
from multiple print and digital
sources,…
2. Write informative/
explanatory texts through the
effective selection of content.
5. Use appropriate tools strategically: …identify relevant external resources.1.1.8 Demonstrate mastery of technology tools for accessing
information and pursuing
inquiry.
1.3.2 Seek divergent perspectives during information gathering
and assessment.
3b. Locate, organize, analyze, evaluate, synthesize, and ethically use information from a variety of sources and
media.
4. Use of
Information
2. Write informative/
explanatory texts through
the effective selection,
organization, and analysis of
content.
8. Gather relevant information
from multiple print and digital
sources …and integrate the
information while avoiding
plagiarism.
2. Reason abstractly and
quantitatively:…create a coherent representation of the problem at hand
5. Use appropriate tools strategically: …make sound decisions about
when tools might be helpful …use technological tools.
1.1.7 Make sense of information gathered from diverse sources
by identifying misconceptions,
main and supporting ideas, conflicting information, and point of view or bias.
2.1.1 Apply critical-thinking skills
(analysis, synthesis, evaluation, organization) to information and knowledge.
1.3.3 Follow ethical and legal guidelines in gathering and using information.
4c. Collect and analyze data to identify solutions
and/or make informed
decisions.
5a. Advocate and practice
safe, legal, and responsible
use of information and
technology.
5. Synthesis1. Write arguments to support
claims in an analysis of
substantive topics or texts,
using valid reasoning and
relevant and sufficient
evidence.
2. Write informative/
explanatory texts to examine
and convey complex ideas
and information clearly
and accurately through
the effective selection,
organization, and analysis of
content.
4. Produce clear and coherent
writing in which the
development, organization, and
style are appropriate to task,
purpose, and audience.
9. Draw evidence from literary
or informational texts to
support analysis, reflection,
and research.
1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them: …explain correspondences between equations, verbal descriptions, tables, and graphs.
3. Construct viable arguments:…justify conclusions.
6. Attend to precision: …communicate precisely to others.
2.1.4 Use technology and other information tools to analyze and organize information.
3.1.4 Use technology and other information tools to organize and display knowledge and
understanding in ways that others can view, use, and assess.
2a. Interact, collaborate,
and publish with peers, experts, or others,
employing a variety of digital environments and
media.
2b. Communicate
information and ideas effectively to multiple
audiences, using a variety
of media and formats.
6. Evaluation5. Develop and strengthen
writing as needed by planning,
revising, editing, rewriting, or
trying a new approach.
10. Write routinely over
extended time frames (time
for research, reflection, and
revision) and shorter time
frames (a single sitting or a day or two) for a range of tasks, purposes, and audiences.
1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them: …monitor
and evaluate progress.
8. Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning: …continually
evaluate the reasonableness of their
immediate results.
3.4.1 Assess the processes by which learning was achieved in
order to revise strategies and learn more effectively in the future.
3.4.2 Assess the quality and effectiveness of the learning product.
1a. Apply existing
knowledge to generate
new ideas, products, or
processes.
5b. Exhibit a positive
attitude toward using
technology that supports
collaboration, learning,
and productivity.
The Big6(TM) is copyright (1987) Michael B. Eisenberg and Robert E. Berkowitz. For more information, visit www.Big6.com. Compiled by Janet Murray from "Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects." 2010. http://corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ ELA%20Standards.pdf. "Common Core State Standards for Mathematics." http://corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_
Math%20Standards.pdf. "AASL Standards for the 21st-Century Learner. American Association of School Librarians, 2007. www.ala.org/aasl/standards. National Educational Technology Standards for Students, Second Edition, ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education), 2007. www.iste. org. See also "Big6 Skills Aligned with Common Core Standards," http://janetsinfo.com/Big6_CCSSIStds.htm, and "Big6 Skills Aligned with ICT Literacy
Standards," http://janetsinfo.com/Big6_ICTLitStds.htm.

 

The Next Generation Science Standards (2013), Curriculum Standards for Social Studies (2010), and the College, Career, and Civic Life (C3) Framework for Social Studies State Standards (2013) are additional pieces woven together with critical thinking as the connecting thread.

Next Generation Science Standards (2013)Curriculum Standards for Social Studies (2010)College, Career, and Civic Life (C3) Framework for Social Studies State Standards
Implementing the NGSS will better prepare high school graduates for the rigors of college and careers. In turn, employers will be able to hire workers with strong science-based skills — not
only in specific content areas, but also with skills such as critical thinking and inquiry-based
problem-solving.
(Achieve)
The aim of social studies is the promotion
of civic competence …requires that citizens
have the ability to use their knowledge about their community, nation, and world; to apply inquiry processes; and to employ skills of data collection and analysis, collaboration, decisionmaking, and problem-solving. (National Council for the Social Studies)
Its objectives are to: a) enhance the rigor of the social studies disciplines; b) build critical
thinking, problem-solving,
and participatory skills to become engaged citizens; and c) align academic programs to the Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy in History/Social Studies. (National
Council for Social Studies)

 

In 2014 we can look forward to another set of national common standards to consider. The National Coalition for Core Arts Standards (NCCAS) will be releasing “a final public review of the draft PreK-12 arts standards in dance, media arts, music, theatre, and visual arts.” According to the NCCAS website:

The new, voluntary grade by grade web-based standards are intended to affirm the place of arts education in a balanced core curriculum, support the 21st-century needs of students and teachers, and help ensure that all students are college and career ready. The arts standards emphasize “big ideas,” philosophical foundations, enduring understandings/essential questions, and anchor/performance standards, all of which are intended to guide the curriculum development and instructional practices that leads to arts literacy for all students. (National Art Education Association)

The developers of these standards make explicit connections to the Common Core State Standards and, like all of the other standards, make reference to 21st century skills without providing clear guidance for teachers as to what that set of skills might look like in the context of the five disciplines contained in the arts standards.

All of the content-specific standards (CCSS, NGSS, C3, Arts, etc.) make explicit reference to critical thinking and problem-solving. However, none of these standards clearly define both what these skills look like through the grade levels or how to assess the specific set of skills that make up the information problem-solving process. The various standards do not provide a common vocabulary that cuts across the rich content they define. For students to truly understand the problemsolving process and how it can be applied to any academic challenge, they need to have the vocabulary and understanding of the process. For teachers to be prepared to provide effective instruction, they need a clear pattern to follow. Through the Defined, Predictable, Measured, and Reported components of the Big6 by the Month program, we help to make sense of the complex relationship of standards, instruction, content, and assessment. Instruction and assessment become more focused through the lens of Big6 critical thinking skills that are thoughtfully developed as students advance through K-12 curricula.

Here is the extraordinary opportunity for teacher-librarians to lead the critical thinking effort! The Big6 by the Month approach provides a clear and systematic approach to follow. And, while it does provide direction, it isn’t prescriptive or “one size fits all.” The Big6 by the Month approach must be adjusted to fit to existing school curricula and calendars, resources available, individual classroom needs, and, ultimately, to students’ learning. Classroom teachers and teacher-librarians will be challenged to use their best professional judgment and skill to create engaging and challenging opportunities for students to practice critical thinking and problem-solving—a real antidote to the programmed and lock-step approaches that the No Child Left Behind Act has encouraged.

None of the standards we’ve highlighted are laundry lists to be checked off or covered. Rather, by using the Big6 by the Month approach, teacher-librarians can ensure that all students have access to the best critical thinking curriculum and instruction possible.

LEARN MORE ABOUT THE BIG6 BY THE MONTH PROGRAM

The goal of the Big6 by the Month team is to fulfill the promise of a comprehensive information literacy program. We define this with the following four elements:

  • A comprehensive program should reach all students in the school.
  • A comprehensive program should be predictable in terms of what students are expected to learn and how they are to learn it.
  • A comprehensive program should be measurable in terms of setting accountable goals for the program and assessing performance by the students.
  • A comprehensive program should report the results—to the students, their teachers, parents and guardians, and the overall school and district. (Eisenberg and Murray)

Big6 by the Month: Comprehensive Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Literacy for All Students, our new e-book, compiles three years of live webinar presentations and resources. It is available at www.big6.com. In addition to the content of the webinars, the new book includes sample lesson plans and templates to identify standards, learning expectations (or grade level objectives), program plans, unit plans, and lesson plans. You can participate in our discussion group at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/b6month and check out all the open resources that we have created, collected, and curated at https://sites.google.com/site/Big6xthemonth/home.

WHAT CAN YOU DO NOW?

  • Commit to Big6 by the Month; start planning for next year.
  • Communicate and explain Big6 by the Month to your administrators and teachers.
  • Identify state and national standards.
  • Identify grade level objectives.
  • Register for webinars or access recorded ones.
  • Review the web-based materials linked to the Big6 by the Month site.
  • Review this year’s discussions; contribute your great ideas. (Eisenberg and Murray)

THE BIG6 BY THE MONTH TEAM

Additional Resources

Achieve, "Executive Summary." The Next Generation Science Standards. June 2013. Web. 27 December 2013. www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards.; Eisenberg, Michael B. and Janet Murray. "Big6 by the Month: A New Approach." Library Media Connection (May 2011).; National Art Education Association. "National Coalition for Core Arts Standards." National Art Education Association, 2013. Web. 27 December 2013. www.arteducators.org/research/nccas.; National Council for the Social Studies. "College, Career, and Civic Life (C3) Framework for Social Studies State Standards." National Council for the Social Studies. 11 September 2013. Web. 27 December 2013. www.socialstudies.org/c3.; National Council for the Social Studies. "National Curriculum Standards for Social Studies: Executive Summary." National Council for the Social Studies, 2010. Web. 27 December 2013. www.socialstudies.org/standards/execsummary.

About the Author

Dr. Michael B. Eisenberg conducts research, writes, consults, and lectures frequently on information literacy, information technology, information management in learning and teaching, and information and library education. Dr. Eisenberg focuses on the use of information and information technology by individuals and organizations to meet their information needs and manage their information more effectively and efficiently. He is nationally known for his innovative approach to information problem-solving and technology in learning and teaching the Big6. Dr. Eisenberg earned his BA and MLS from SUNY at Albany and his Ph.D. in Information Transfer from the School of Information Studies at Syracuse University.

MLA Citation

Eisenberg, Michael B., and Janet Murray. "Big6 by the Month: A Common Sense Approach to Effective Use of Common Standards for Information Literacy Learning." Library Media Connection, 32, no. 6, May 2014. School Library Connection, schoollibraryconnection.com/Content/Article/1949157.

View all citation styles

https://schoollibraryconnection.com/Content/Article/1949157?topicCenterId=2247902

Entry ID: 1949157