When applied to discipline, the concept of exclusion in high schools often involves the process of removing a student from a school activity or setting. In its most extreme case, disciplinary exclusion refers to expulsion, suspension, removal from class, or being prohibited from attending a school event. High school librarians may recognize this circumstance: a student may be temporarily or permanently excluded from school library use for breaking a school rule, like violence, theft, or disruption. Other students may choose to avoid the library if they have been in trouble there before, self-excluding to avoid more trouble. Some may avoid the library if they have fines or overdue materials related to circumstances outside of their control (McLeod, Sigle, and Valentine 2019).
The school library is a space of solace and comfort. However, there may be policies in the school or school library that are actually restricting or excluding certain students from using the library; below, we'll consider how school and library policies may be affecting use of the library by certain students. There is little data available about who is excluded from use of library facilities for disciplinary reasons. More research should be conducted to understand who and what types of behaviors or activities impact a student's right to use library facilities and services. However, it is well-established that students who receive exclusionary punishments, like expulsion or suspension, are often males from minority backgrounds, have low socioeconomic status, have a disability, or have demonstrated low academic performance (Christie, Nelson and Jolivette 2004). In addition, the decision to provide a student with an exclusionary punishment is often arbitrary and biased towards students who are deemed troublesome by teachers and administrators (Welch and Payne 2012).
Some schools have policies that may inadvertently impact student use of the library. For example, some schools participate in behavior incentive programs that allow students to earn passes to the library if they meet certain expectations. This type of positive incentive program offers library access as a reward but in the process will restrict access to students who can't meet expectations of attendance, grades, or behavior. Equity literacy scholars suggest that the reasons students may not meet these expectations could be related to situations directly or indirectly outside of their control, like illness, stressors at home, disabilities, or learning differences (Dubose and Gorski 2020) and that these students could benefit personally and academically from study time in the library.
Libraries may also have code of conduct policies that inadvertently exclude some students more than others. Librarians can examine their codes of conduct to ensure that the rules and language used are free from implicit bias and to remove exclusionary language. They can also look for and limit those violations that will remove a student's access to library spaces or use of library resources. As part of this process, librarians can determine if there are trends that can be addressed in other ways. For example, some libraries restrict privileges if students share their access to library resources with others. Students denied library access for trying to access the library more should perhaps face other consequences than exclusion.
Libraries often include a variety of spaces to accommodate active learning and independent study. Some students will want to meet their study group in the library or will join a table with friends. Others will want to come work independently to catch up or finish work that they were unable to do at home. Some will want to read on their own or recharge their phones. Others may want to sit by the window for sunlight that they may not have in their other classrooms. All of these experiences are part of using the library. Librarians should aim to offer spaces for these activities and plan the library space to ensure that both groups and individuals have places to sit and work. In addition, policies should grant all members of a study group opportunity to visit the library, so that students are not left out of a study group due to school or library policies.
School libraries never intend to exclude, as it goes against one of the Shared Foundations and Key Commitments of school librarianship, which is to ensure that libraries provide equitable physical access to the library (AASL 2018). There are a few strategies for school librarians to investigate which students may be excluded from library use. AASL provides a "School Library Evaluation Checklist" that school librarians can use as a guide to start thinking about how their policies include or exclude students (2018). For example, the building level checklist for the Include foundation recommends that librarians ensure barrier-free access to facilities and resources. Librarians can ask themselves, what barriers are there for students in accessing the library space at an individual level? At school? At home? Understanding these barriers can help librarians be more empathetic towards challenging situations experienced by students.
Librarians often focus on those who visit the library, but assessing a library for exclusion involves understanding more about who is not visiting the library and why. Another way to examine exclusion is through a policy analysis. A policy analysis includes a line-by-line analysis of existing policies that looks for hidden bias in the language used, as well as exclusion and equity concerns that may show that certain students are more negatively affected by a policy than others (see Table 1). Critical reflection related to the language and message hidden within library policies may be the first steps towards developing a more inclusive practice.
Table 1. Examples of policies that restrict library privileges
|
|
|
Incentive Programs |
Students can earn passes to visit the school library through good attendance, grades and behavior.
|
Some students will be unable to meet the expectations to earn the pass. These students may not feel comfortable visiting the library if they haven't earned it.
|
School Code of Conduct |
Students are responsible for paying any library fines incurred for overdue, lost, or damaged materials charged to their library account.
|
Some students are unable to pay fines or replace the lost items due to moving, changing homes, foster care, or homelessness. |
Library Code of Conduct |
Students are not permitted to use their ID card to download or share information on library computers with others.
|
Students who do this may be trying to help friends who have lost their card, have trouble using their card, or who are not able to visit the library. |
Library Rules |
Please do not move the furniture including chairs; five chairs per table.
|
The sixth student in a study or friend group is socially excluded and risks loss of library privileges in joining the study group. |
AASL. National School Library Standards for Learners, School Librarians, and School Libraries. ALA, 2018.
Christie, Christine A., Michael Nelson, and Kristine Jolivette. "School Characteristics Related to the Use of Suspension." Education & Treatment of Children 27, no. 4 (2004): 509–526.
DuBose, Marceline, and Paul Gorski. "Equity Literacy during COVID 19." Equity Literacy Institute. https://www.equityliteracy.org/equity-covid-19. Accessed June 20, 2020.
McLeod, Barbara E., Kim Christiansen Sigle, and Kesha S. Valentine. "Management Matters. Losing Readers Is Worse than Losing Books." School Library Connection (July 2019). http://schoollibraryconnection.com/Home/Display/2214594.
Welch, Kelly, and Allison Ann Payne. "Exclusionary School Punishment: The Effect of Racial Threat on Expulsion and Suspension." Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice 10, no. 2 (2012): 155–171.
MLA Citation
Kammer, Jenna. "Disciplinary Exclusion Policies that Impact Library Access." School Library Connection, October 2020, schoollibraryconnection.com/Content/Article/2256026.
Entry ID: 2256026